How to Live With a Neurotic Dog by Stephen Baker
1994
Weight: 16 oz
Method of Disposal: Lending Library
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiR9-rTQb0rI6S6S4TntX90DFJiOwk3ZRSM0OJPut86AZ2kQYnyC8igxU1iWY1_BDqAzB-hSGnzilD9V_RpPlQ9VKTLwZxe6Lyf3FyyYpWGiv-P7Mjcff_ZBXlYGhpxEdTf4OOQDDrtBjlU/s320/Dog+Cartoon2.jpg)
Animal rescue has ruined me for books like these. I get judgmental when people make stupid mistakes or see what they want to see with an animal, while missing what is clearly, actually happening. I cannot suspend my rescue brain long enough to just enjoy the read! Apparently, even with horses.
That being said, I enjoyed hearing about so many horses being rescued, loved, and cared for, especially for the length of their natural lives. I hate how so many horses are given up or euthanized once they are no longer seen as useful.
I am hoping my niece will enjoy this book. I know she is not all that keen on reading yet, but she loves all things horse. I love all things rescue. It seemed like a perfect combination and so I have mailed it to her.
This was an easy to read and helpful little book in the 90s when my father gave it to me in hopes he could help me figure out how to be a more responsible adult. Unfortunately for me and him, I had no interest in learning about stocks, bonds, mutual funds, money markets. I wanted to help people, create art, be involved in the community. This book was perfect for a teenager. Pictures, definitions, easy explanations. I picked it up as an adult and thought, why not? I read it, but it was so dated. It is interesting to read about the way things used to be done before the internet changed the world and to see the origin of things we do now. It is interesting to see how much the world is the same and different after 21 years. I cannot believe how much I am the same but different 21 years later.
My wife was 8 years old. I was 14. It is so hard to imagine two life trajectories, even when they have been lived.
This is a hard one. The story itself is very interesting, a young man goes off into the woods to survive by way of minor theft, staying hidden, and building a rudimentary encampment in Maine. He spoke one word to one hiker in 25 years and survived some brutal winters. He claims he did this without even lighting a fire. Some people consider him a simple thief, others a convicted felon who made them feel unsafe for years, and others think of him as a wise man who has done the unthinkable and potentially knows some great truths that the rest of us may struggle to obtain or may never obtain.
I am of the train of thought that he is not just a simple thief or felon, and that there is no reason to resent him for being "lazy," as many have, and also that he is not a magical, wise man with all sorts of insight. I do feel for the families that lived in fear and were scared someone would break in with their children in the home, though I do agree with those who think prison time and a life sentence would make no sense in this case. To me, he is just a man with mental health concerns that are unlike most of the population and, because of how his mind works and who he is, he managed to do something extraordinary that many of us could not even begin to conceive of doing.
As for the author, I struggle. I am excited with him when Mr. Knight (the "hermit") writes him back after he sends him a letter, but things get uncomfortable towards the end when Mr. Knight and his family plead with the author to leave him alone. On the one hand, I do think he found a special connection with Mr. Knight and that there was something about him that Mr. Knight was somewhat drawn to and, on the other hand, CONSENT. It is hard though. Things are not black and white when Mr. Knight says that he will likely kill himself and asks the author to turn away and leave him to it. Mr. Knight also tells him, at one point, to write whatever he wants and that he is not concerned about it at all.
Some people really think the author is exploiting Mr. Knight, and I really believe the author is genuinely enthralled with him and cares about him. I think this book was likely a labor of love and enchantment but, when a man tells you to leave him alone enough, you do need to leave him alone, of course, which he ultimately does. So, I clearly do not know anything and have no answers, but there is no way around the fact that this is a unique and interesting story.
How is it that Milan Kundara was one of my favorite authors at some point? I really did not enjoy this book at all. I do think he is an excellent writer, but he treats women like trash and there is never a believable woman character. They are all just receptacles for toxic masculinity and potentially ejaculate, depending on how successful the deplorable, inhumane male characters are. I hated it.